Development of Character Typology theory and the four principal style Essay

Development of Character Typology theory and the four principal style typologies that result from it - turn up ExampleBehavioural and personality models are widely used in organisations, especially in psychometrics and psychometric testing (personality assessments and tests). Behavioural and personality models film also been used by philosophers, leaders and managers for many years as an aid to understanding, explaining, and managing communications and relationships. Properly used, psychometrics and personality tests can be hugely beneficial in improving knowledge of oneself and other people - motivations, strengths, weaknesses, preferred thinking and working styles, and also strengths and preferred styles for communications, learning, management, being managed, and team up-working. Understanding personality - of yourself and others - is aboriginal to motivation. Different people have different strengths and needs that must be satisfied to be properly motivated. The more you und erstand about personality, the better capable you are to judge what motivates people - and yourself. The more you understand about your own personality and that of other people, the better able you are to realise how others perceive you, and how they respond to your own personality and style. ... Understanding personality types are helpful for appreciating that while people are different, everyone has a value and special strengths and qualities and that everyone should be treated with awe and respect. The relevance of love and spirituality especially at work is easier to see and explain when we understand that differences in people are usually personality-based (Chapman). Different types time lag information in different ways. Different types make decisions in different ways. Different types resolve conflicts in different ways. And different types have different exponent (UBI mod. 2) The development of character typology theory involves different phases such as forming, stormin g, norming and performing. United Business Institutes Information Systems under volume 4 states the side by side(p) character development phases Forming phase - the character is unwilling to undertake the work and unable to do so. Lack of knowledge and lack of skills. Tend to focus on themselves rather than the team. Storming willing to attempt the work but still unable to do it as skills still missing. High conflict potential as team members present and challenge ideas. Norming unwillingness returns, possibly due to a lack of confidence in new skills but they are able to do the work. point tends to be on rules, processes and the how of the work. And performing willing and able to do the work and to act as an effective team. Focus changes to delivering the objectives. Its important to realise that no-one fully understands the finish to which personality is determined by genetics and hereditary factors, compared to the effects of up-bringing, culture, environment and experience . Nature versus nurture, no-one knows. Most studies